Wednesday 7 September 2016

Wages UP! Latest Update, up by another £6692

Now I can see why they Parish Council has been so reluctant to release the information about the increase in administration costs to the community. In the blog below you will see that in the Annual Accounts of 2015, which are on the Parish Website the cost of wages overall for the Parish Council was

 £38,194

This is now due to be increased in one year with all allied costs included to....

£44,886     an increase of £6692

The letter I received quoted this as an explanation....

"Staffing costs for 2016/17 as agreed in the budget set in December 2015 is £44,8860.00. This figure includes costs for Salaries, PAYE, National Insurance, Pension Fund, Payroll, Training and Seminars. Any variation of this figure will be need to be discussed at the Finance Committee in November and passed to the Full Council for conformation.

The recommendation from NALC/SLCC was to follow the Local Government pay award of 1% increase in salaries in each of the years 2016/17 and 2017/18. The Parish Council accepted this recommendation at its meeting in June 2016."

End Quote.

So I may be wrong but it seems that a 1% increase in pay award, in cash terms results in a 17% to the tax payer. Now I may be wrong here but the facts are plain, the old rate was £38,194, the increase is £6692, which is a 17.5% increase by my reckoning.

The wages cost in 2009 was £18,886, and now it is £44,886, an Annual increase of £26,000 over the period of Austerity.

Now again let me state clearly, I have no problem in principle with good wages for a job. However this increase on the wages cost for the running of the Parish Council, I would expect a commensurate increase in performance and efficiency as well as a significant upgrade in the way the Parish Council communicates with the public. The bare minimum of posting notices on the notice boards is no longer good enough, the smoke and mirrors of administration is no longer acceptable. Our community is paying an extra 125% in local tax, with an extra 500+ new people moving into the community, all paying the local tax, delivered by the poor "Save the Haywoods" campaigns which never saved the Haywoods from anything at all.

I say to everyone in Colwich and the Haywoods, this is your cash, your council, it is time for a change, a change of leadership, a change of style of administration, we should all be demanding open accountable accessible communication. I will set out on this blog over the coming months exactly how this can easily be achieved. We are paying for it, as a community we deserve the best, we should not be settling for the lowest bar possible within the legal framework, we should be not just aiming but achieving the HIGHEST levels of communication with the community the Parish Council serves.

I believe our Parish Council CAN be awarded the GOLD standard for Parish Councils and when and IF I am re-elected at the next elections I will make it my business to ensure that Colwich parish Council becomes a Gold standard council.

Quality Gold Status 

The Quality Gold Award demonstrates that a council is at the forefront of best practice and achieves excellence in governance, community leadership and council development. Quality Gold councils provide leadership for their communities, bring people together, and have excellent business planning processes, ensuring value for money as well as constantly seeking new innovations and opportunities to improve. 






This is the story that just runs and runs, I have now received a reply from the Parish Council regarding my freedom of information request and I can now tell you how much the pay rise will be to the tax payer in the next couple of years..............

Oh if it were only that simple......this next bit is priceless!!!

They are sending the information in the POST!!, the extra cost of a stamp, envelope, paper and the time it has taken to write the letter.

Now that in itself is just designed to frustrate me getting hold of the information quicker, BUT THERE IS MORE!!!

Now I have been banned from sending my requests addressed to MR CLERK, as this person "In the Authority" does not exist!! and failure to send the request to a specific person could result in a delay in any responses to a legal request for information.

You just could not make it up, they are the only people in the office!!

They sit in the office each day, they are the Clerks to the Parish Council, they are as I believe both men, so the preface of MR is entirely right, they are Clerks to the council so using their title is not unusual, especially as I have no idea who will receive the request........it is just priceless, and this is what we are paying for.

The response in full set out below was authorised by the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Parish Council Andy Cooper and Adam Billingsley, it will be interesting to see the draft agenda which will be issued soon to see what other important issues they have prioritised for this months meeting.


Dear Mr Pearce,

A hard copy of the response sent on 19th August has been sent by post.

For future reference: there is no-one in the Authority known as 'Mr Clerk'. Should you wish to submit future Freedom Of Information, or any other, requests then might I suggest you address these requests to a known member of the Authority's staff i.e. to either my 'Rev Mr Lennon' as the Parish Clerk or to my deputy 'Mr Egan'. Failure to do so might result in a delay in answering your request(s).

Rev Mr Michael Lennon, MILCM
Clerk to Colwich Parish Council
The Parish Centre,
St Mary's Road
Little Haywood
ST18 0TX


01889 882665

clerk@Colwich.staffslc.gov.uk

www.colwich.info

If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify Colwich Parish Council and then delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately. This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and may contain privileged information, if you are not the intended recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of this e-mail or attachments is strictly prohibited. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken, no guarantee is given that it is free from any virus and Colwich Parish Council accepts no liability or responsibility for such viruses. This e--mail is not intended nor should it be taken to create any legal relations, contractual or otherwise.



Well here we go again, I asked a simple question of the Parish Council who, as set out in the Blog below have already recently raised the cost of wages to the local public purse by a whopping 50% during a recession. They have just voted through a further 2 years of increases to this, I have no idea what this further percentage this is, or how much the total is. So I sent a simple Freedom of Information request to find out so everyone is aware of the extra planned cost. I received an email with an attachment, the attachment would not open. I asked for the information to be re-sent, nothing not an acknowledgement of my request, nothing, and this perfectly sets out what we are paying for, this is what the pay rise is for, for the administration to send another email I have had to ask twice and still no answer. with the 125% increase in local taxes, the over 50% increase in total wages cost with more planned, our community deserves better administration and better open accountable communication. So I am no further in letting you know what they are spending because they are refusing to re-send the information. I have already had to wait over the 20 days for a FOI request, this is YOUR cash they are spending, YOUR money that remains un accounted for, YOUR council refusing to open their accounts to simple local scrutiny, YOUR council that needs to become routinely more open and accountable. IF you are reading this and you are ON THE COUNCIL, then all you have to do is to send a quick email to the clerk and ask them why they are not communicating with the public, why they are ignoring legitimate requests for information. I will post an update as soon as I receive one.......not holding my breath, so I will re-send a formal Freedom of information request, it seems the only way to get the information out of this shady council.


I will over the coming months and years be looking into and revealing facts about how the communities money has been spent over the years. It would be nice if all I had to do was to email the council and ask, but sadly this information has to be asked for as a freedom of information request as much of what happens in the council runs through a filter of smoke and mirrors.

Now there are those who will say that this type of scrutiny is bullying and offensive and that I am picking on the parish council. I say this is democracy in action, the people keeping the executive accountable to the community or constituency they serve. The answer to shutting me up is simple, change the council to be more open accountable visible and transparent, if this is done I will have nothing to chat about with you, will I. So those who attack me for saying these things, I say get behind the closed doors of the council and start changing it, spend your time resolving the issues, rather than supporting the status quo which isn't good enough any more.

Lets look at a simple example, how much it costs to run the council, now we are told it is £93,000 quite a sum really. Lets think for a while.........do we get value for money for that sum?

This cash comes directly from our local community collective wallets

Do you feel that the community has changed in the last 5 years?

Do you think that the burdens on the Parish Council have vastly increased in the last 5 years?

Do you look around you and see the massive added value in the community of spending that £93,000?, do you know what the cash is spent on? do you have any idea how it came to be such a large amount?

If you look on the Parish Website you will see under the section Marked "Other Documents" a long list of documents mostly historical.

If you look at the Annual Report of 2009, you will see that the cost of "wages pensions etc." was £18,886, if you then open the Annual Report for this year 2015 you will see this jump to a massive...


£38,194 that is an ongoing annual increase of £19,308 a 50.5% increase in salary costs. During a recession, and at a time of austerity. All other councils have been forced into cutting services and reducing staffing during this time. 

If you read the recent full council minutes you will see that this cost has just been agreed to be increased again this year and next. I am waiting for confirmation from the council of what exactly the uplift is in cash terms.

Let me also be clear, there is nothing inherently wrong in wages going up, I will leave you to judge if this raise is acceptable, but any business or organisation must be able to point to how that added cost has benefited the community it needs to be seen and visible. This is not a rant, this is just right. When people accuse me of having a chip on my shoulder it is because I keep uncovering facts like these. So lets be clear I am not having ago at the recipients of the wages they are employees of the council they just receive what they are given. Here are the wages cost of a number of other local parish councils, with councils of a comparable size with comparable work to do.

Hixon total cost for this year £9,159
Haughton total costs for this year. £5,082
Eccleshall total costs this year £28,555
Barlaston £15,580

So it is right to ask the question with a £19,308 a Year increase in just 5 years what value add is the community getting for that significant investment of local tax, remember those wages are funded ONLY from us here in the community. Ask yourself want has radically changed in just 5 years in our community that warrants this need for extra expense. This is not an issue for the Clerk he is just doing his job, this is an issue quite clearly and directly for the Management and Organisation of the Parish Council, Directly the Chairman and the Vice Chairman who are directly responsible for the operational management of the council.

I started asking for better efficiency, better up to date communication, better administration, and I was blocked at every turn

So when I am asking the council why are the minutes of the meetings are not on the website, and I get the answer they are in the window come and look, I get more than a little frustrated that for this increase we are receiving a minimum standard of communication from the council.

All entirely within the "Quoted Rules" of "Arnold Baker" but all entirely the minimum that is required by law. To me that shows a contempt for the community and the people who pay for those increases. Our community is not some backwater, yes we have a few of the older generation not on the internet or facebook but in general the community is well connected.

In previous Parish councils the level of communication was much better. The website was always updated promptly, what was going on in the village advertised accordingly, minutes from meetings published within days of the meeting not months.

Am I really asking for too much? asking for the website that WE pay for to be regularly updated, for the minutes of meetings to be set out in clear English, agendas to be published with background notes for those not attending to read. Is it too much for the Clerks report to be published so we can see what has been achieved. Is it really too much to have the meetings recorded so we can all see how decisions are made. Is it too much to ask how tenders are done, who is on the tender process and why. I think not, we are entitled to know what is being done in our name and with our cash.

 Its all about open accountable transparent leadership. The Clerks office will do what the council tells it to, so this is not an issue for the clerks office it is the clear "Choice" of the leadership of the council.

I will over time be scrutinising the accounts and looking at what the spending criteria has been over the last 5 years and making sure that a NEW method of accounting is developed that will allow the public easy access to the accounts in a meaningful way. It is a simple process not complicated at all.

Anyone in business will know that to manage the finances of the business you have a detailed spreadsheet of income and costs. Where regular costs are incurred they are called fixed costs and where spot purchases are required or where cost vary they are called variable costs. Each cost to the business has a named line item with a short explanation at the front to identify it, with a cost code attached. The cost code is the way you allocate various costs to a single project, thus producing a simple end of project cost for all the projects in the year. The cost of every project should be published, and a comprehensive breakdown of expenditure should be published to allow the public to see what their cash is being spent on.

An example, and to be fair I would go much further, can be found on the Hixon website http://hixon.gov.uk/Finance/spreadsheet This set out clearly what has been spent and where.

So in the age of Austerity I have asked the Parish Council as a start to tell me how much cash has been spent on Legal Fees for ANY projects in this council and the last, specifically asking what project the legal fee was for and a breakdown of fees per project, I will publish the results here on this blog. This is a freedom of information request, so I have to wait until mid august for the information to be sent. I hope it will be in a form that will be easy for you to digest.

Remember this is YOUR cash this is the money YOU PAY OUT OF YOUR PURSE's and WALLETS EVERY YEAR.



23 comments:

  1. When did the Audit commission last took a look at these figures ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's be clear, the books are audited every year, there is no evidence at all of any fraud or wrong doing by the council, nothing done is illegal. What is happening here is a massive increase in the cost of administration of the council, without a massive increase in service to the community, in fact under recent councils communication has been taking ongoing backward steps. I would be happy if for all this extra cash we were getting a top line information base using all the latest technology, sadly that is far from the case.

    ReplyDelete
  3. who the hell authorises this increase I wish I had 20K extra

    ReplyDelete
  4. What is happening is Lazy accountability, the councillors sit in the chamber and the clerk starts wafting around papers and reports, none of which the councillors get to read. The clerk tells everyone an edited precis of the truth, which is that the governing body of Clerks to Parish Councils recommend a pay rise of X percent, and it gets voted through. Obviously the clerks office then gets this raise automatically every year if it is not challenged, in cash terms it gets more and more even if the % is relatively small. There is never a give get put on the table, we will up your wages in return for improvements to performance. There is never a cost comparison with other council as I have set out in this blog. I have been involved in business for a number of years, people including me got a pay rise based on performance, its not a dirty word, its making best use of public money. This is not an issue for the Clerk its Andy Cooper and Adam Billingsley they are the decision makers, they make the recommendations to the council, they undertake the performance review of the clerk, they set standing orders and minimum standards.

    ReplyDelete
  5. why have they not sent you the info?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Your guess is as good as mine, I think they feel that they have sent it and the fact that it is unreadable is my problem not theirs. However the Information Commissioner does not agree, they understand that the request is not complete until the request is sent in a format that is readable by the recipient. Attachments often get corrupted, re-sending information is often required, and is seen as part of the legitimate process of using electronic communications.

    ReplyDelete
  7. what are they trying to hide sounds dodgy to me

    ReplyDelete
  8. not dodgy just exceptionally Lazy administration, yet we are paying for a 50% increase in wages, 125% increase in local tax and we have to endure lazy administration. Its all about management and how the council is being run. Its still being run by the Save the Haywoods group, that's the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  9. so how much has it gone up by?

    ReplyDelete
  10. could be anything, it just states in the mins of the meeting that it is going up this year and next. Nothing confidential about this, it is all a matter of public record, that's assuming you have open clear accounting which this council don't.

    ReplyDelete
  11. remember we know the salary of the Prime Minister, our Local MP, the leader of the council, a nurse, a fireman, a doctor, a council cleaner, in fact we know the wages and grades of all public servants, so why is the parish Council deemed different.

    ReplyDelete
  12. At the end of the day it's public money that comes from our taxes so we have every right to ask how it is spent

    ReplyDelete
  13. Agree needs to be more transparency. If everything is above board,what is there to hide, or am I being cynical I thinking that they are just being awkward for the sake of it? PS I've pressed anonymous because I've no idea how to put my name���� Christine Crowe

    ReplyDelete
  14. lol anonymous is just fine, Nothing they are doing is unlawful, but it is specifically designed to make the councils business as hard to access as possible. Remember we are paying the wages in the Council NOT the Councillors. It is the community that the councillors should be running the council for not for themselves. Yes they are volunteers, but many of them feel they are above the ordinary villagers, above local scrutiny, they they exclusively know best how to run the council and the village. I say good luck to them, BUT be more open more accountable more transparent to the people who pay the local tax that pays for the running of the council. If they spent more time doing this they would need to spend less time trying endlessly to cover things up.

    ReplyDelete
  15. lol me or the Rev Mr Michael Lennon MILCM??

    ReplyDelete
  16. NOT YOU HIM what a thing to say to a member of the public asking for help he is a right jobsworth

    ReplyDelete
  17. Now lets be clear he is stating a rule, I am sure he has looked it up especially to make sure he can frustrate me in the future and blame me for not following the rules. The simplest thing is to be open accountable and transparent in the first place and then you would not need to have information that needs to be requested through a Freedom of Information request.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yes but as you say we are paying his wages!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yes and it is not his fault, it is clearly the fault of the Management of the council who direct his work. The Clerk is NOT THE COUNCIL as he is often heard saying. The elected members are the council and the clerk does what his employers tell him to do, in the way they want him to do it. However if you have Andy Cooper and Adam Billingsley not managing the administration of the council effectively in fact actively blocking any reforms on a routine basis then things just stay the same year on year. All I am doing is pointing out whats going wrong. Its not me that's doing things wrong, or hiding facts its the council. The rest of the council should not sit idly by and let this continue, they should insist on change and not just lazily wring their hands and say their is nothing they can do, they should act to improve the Openness the transparency and the accountability of the council.

    ReplyDelete
  20. How can a 1% pay rise for the clerks lead to a 17% increase in wage cost?

    ReplyDelete
  21. I have absolutely no idea, really I have no idea how that works, I am guessing that the Parish Councillors would not be able to work that one out either. Its all part of the smoke and mirrors and blindly accepting that they are being given accurate information, nobody is checking, absolutely nobody.

    ReplyDelete
  22. whi is responsible for this?

    ReplyDelete
  23. The Clerk is an employee of the council. The council have an Employment committee on which sit the Chairman of the council. It is the responsibility of the whole of the committee to scrutinise the wage cost increase. It is the Chairmans job as he is the line manager of the Clerk to stamp all performance and pay related issues on an ongoing basis. The clerk cannot be blamed for any of the processes he has to deliver it is for the council to decide what processes and policies the council should adopt and the chairman to ensure the clerk delivers the councils directions.

    ReplyDelete